Head-to-Head Comparison
Uptime Kuma vs Statping-ng
A side-by-side technical evaluation across security posture, maintenance cadence, community vitality, and commercial licensing within the Monitoring & Status category.
Option A
Uptime Kuma
louislam/uptime-kuma93/100
High-reliability synthetic uptime and service health monitoring server with multi-channel alerting.
HealthyFull Audit Report →
Option B
Statping-ng
statping-ng/statping-ng56/100
Community fork of the discontinued Statping status page and monitoring server.
CautionFull Audit Report →
Technical & Metric Comparison
Verifiable data scraped directly from GitHub API and OpenSSF scorecards.
| Metric | Uptime Kuma | Statping-ng | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composite Safety Score | 93/100 | 56/100 | Uptime Kuma |
| Status Verdict | Healthy | Caution | — |
| License SPDX | MIT | GPL-3.0-only | — |
| GitHub Stars | 62,400 | 2,100 | Uptime Kuma (+60,300) |
| Primary Language | JavaScript / Vue | Go | — |
| Self-Host Difficulty | Easy | Medium | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 8.6/10 | 5.1/10 | Uptime Kuma |
| Last Push | 1d ago | 145d ago | Uptime Kuma |
Which Should You Pick? (Algorithmic Verdict)
Uptime Kuma holds a decisive advantage with a Safety Score of 93/100 compared to Statping-ng's 56/100. This divergence stems from superior maintenance responsiveness, fewer active supply-chain alerts, and stronger automated security audits. For production deployments, Uptime Kuma is the clear recommendation.
Pick Uptime Kuma if:
- You prefer a JavaScript / Vue-based stack.
- You require MIT licensing terms.
- Its easy deployment fits your ops requirements.
Pick Statping-ng if:
- You prefer a Go-based runtime.
- Your team works comfortably with GPL-3.0-only.
- You value its specific community ecosystem and client support.
ADVERTISEMENTReserved Zero-CLS Placement