Head-to-Head Comparison
Umami vs Plausible Analytics
A side-by-side technical evaluation across security posture, maintenance cadence, community vitality, and commercial licensing within the Analytics & Privacy category.
Option A
Umami
umami-software/umami92/100
Modern, privacy-focused alternative to Google Analytics with simple setup.
HealthyFull Audit Report →
Option B
Plausible Analytics
plausible/analytics91/100
Simple, privacy-friendly, open-source web analytics tool with no cookies.
HealthyFull Audit Report →
Technical & Metric Comparison
Verifiable data scraped directly from GitHub API and OpenSSF scorecards.
| Metric | Umami | Plausible Analytics | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composite Safety Score | 92/100 | 91/100 | Umami |
| Status Verdict | Healthy | Healthy | — |
| License SPDX | MIT | AGPL-3.0-only | — |
| GitHub Stars | 24,300 | 19,800 | Umami (+4,500) |
| Primary Language | TypeScript / Next.js | Elixir | — |
| Self-Host Difficulty | Easy | Medium | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 8.5/10 | 8.3/10 | Umami |
| Last Push | 2d ago | 1d ago | Plausible Analytics |
Which Should You Pick? (Algorithmic Verdict)
Both tools demonstrate competitive quality, with Umami holding a slight operational edge (92/100 vs 91/100). Choose Umami if you prioritize stricter automated testing and recent release hygiene; choose Plausible Analytics if its specific feature set (Elixir) better matches your internal infrastructure.
Pick Umami if:
- You prefer a TypeScript / Next.js-based stack.
- You require MIT licensing terms.
- Its easy deployment fits your ops requirements.
Pick Plausible Analytics if:
- You prefer a Elixir-based runtime.
- Your team works comfortably with AGPL-3.0-only.
- You value its specific community ecosystem and client support.
ADVERTISEMENTReserved Zero-CLS Placement