Head-to-Head Comparison
Umami vs Matomo
A side-by-side technical evaluation across security posture, maintenance cadence, community vitality, and commercial licensing within the Analytics & Privacy category.
Option A
Umami
umami-software/umami92/100
Modern, privacy-focused alternative to Google Analytics with simple setup.
HealthyFull Audit Report →
Option B
Matomo
matomo-org/matomo76/100
Comprehensive Google Analytics alternative with enterprise compliance features.
CautionFull Audit Report →
Technical & Metric Comparison
Verifiable data scraped directly from GitHub API and OpenSSF scorecards.
| Metric | Umami | Matomo | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composite Safety Score | 92/100 | 76/100 | Umami |
| Status Verdict | Healthy | Caution | — |
| License SPDX | MIT | GPL-3.0-or-later | — |
| GitHub Stars | 24,300 | 20,200 | Umami (+4,100) |
| Primary Language | TypeScript / Next.js | PHP | — |
| Self-Host Difficulty | Easy | Medium | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 8.5/10 | 7.2/10 | Umami |
| Last Push | 2d ago | 2d ago | Matomo |
Which Should You Pick? (Algorithmic Verdict)
Umami holds a decisive advantage with a Safety Score of 92/100 compared to Matomo's 76/100. This divergence stems from superior maintenance responsiveness, fewer active supply-chain alerts, and stronger automated security audits. For production deployments, Umami is the clear recommendation.
Pick Umami if:
- You prefer a TypeScript / Next.js-based stack.
- You require MIT licensing terms.
- Its easy deployment fits your ops requirements.
Pick Matomo if:
- You prefer a PHP-based runtime.
- Your team works comfortably with GPL-3.0-or-later.
- You value its specific community ecosystem and client support.
ADVERTISEMENTReserved Zero-CLS Placement