Head-to-Head Comparison
Plausible Analytics vs Matomo
A side-by-side technical evaluation across security posture, maintenance cadence, community vitality, and commercial licensing within the Analytics & Privacy category.
Option A
Plausible Analytics
plausible/analytics91/100
Simple, privacy-friendly, open-source web analytics tool with no cookies.
HealthyFull Audit Report →
Option B
Matomo
matomo-org/matomo76/100
Comprehensive Google Analytics alternative with enterprise compliance features.
CautionFull Audit Report →
Technical & Metric Comparison
Verifiable data scraped directly from GitHub API and OpenSSF scorecards.
| Metric | Plausible Analytics | Matomo | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composite Safety Score | 91/100 | 76/100 | Plausible Analytics |
| Status Verdict | Healthy | Caution | — |
| License SPDX | AGPL-3.0-only | GPL-3.0-or-later | — |
| GitHub Stars | 19,800 | 20,200 | Matomo (+400) |
| Primary Language | Elixir | PHP | — |
| Self-Host Difficulty | Medium | Medium | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 8.3/10 | 7.2/10 | Plausible Analytics |
| Last Push | 1d ago | 2d ago | Plausible Analytics |
Which Should You Pick? (Algorithmic Verdict)
Plausible Analytics holds a decisive advantage with a Safety Score of 91/100 compared to Matomo's 76/100. This divergence stems from superior maintenance responsiveness, fewer active supply-chain alerts, and stronger automated security audits. For production deployments, Plausible Analytics is the clear recommendation.
Pick Plausible Analytics if:
- You prefer a Elixir-based stack.
- You require AGPL-3.0-only licensing terms.
- Its medium deployment fits your ops requirements.
Pick Matomo if:
- You prefer a PHP-based runtime.
- Your team works comfortably with GPL-3.0-or-later.
- You value its specific community ecosystem and client support.
ADVERTISEMENTReserved Zero-CLS Placement