Head-to-Head Comparison
Glances vs Statping-ng
A side-by-side technical evaluation across security posture, maintenance cadence, community vitality, and commercial licensing within the Monitoring & Status category.
Option A
Glances
nicolargo/glances86/100
Curses and web-based system monitoring tool written in Python with REST API.
HealthyFull Audit Report →
Option B
Statping-ng
statping-ng/statping-ng56/100
Community fork of the discontinued Statping status page and monitoring server.
CautionFull Audit Report →
Technical & Metric Comparison
Verifiable data scraped directly from GitHub API and OpenSSF scorecards.
| Metric | Glances | Statping-ng | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composite Safety Score | 86/100 | 56/100 | Glances |
| Status Verdict | Healthy | Caution | — |
| License SPDX | LGPL-3.0-only | GPL-3.0-only | — |
| GitHub Stars | 26,800 | 2,100 | Glances (+24,700) |
| Primary Language | Python | Go | — |
| Self-Host Difficulty | Easy | Medium | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 7.8/10 | 5.1/10 | Glances |
| Last Push | 4d ago | 145d ago | Glances |
Which Should You Pick? (Algorithmic Verdict)
Glances holds a decisive advantage with a Safety Score of 86/100 compared to Statping-ng's 56/100. This divergence stems from superior maintenance responsiveness, fewer active supply-chain alerts, and stronger automated security audits. For production deployments, Glances is the clear recommendation.
Pick Glances if:
- You prefer a Python-based stack.
- You require LGPL-3.0-only licensing terms.
- Its easy deployment fits your ops requirements.
Pick Statping-ng if:
- You prefer a Go-based runtime.
- Your team works comfortably with GPL-3.0-only.
- You value its specific community ecosystem and client support.
ADVERTISEMENTReserved Zero-CLS Placement