Head-to-Head Comparison
BookStack vs Wiki.js
A side-by-side technical evaluation across security posture, maintenance cadence, community vitality, and commercial licensing within the Notes & Documentation category.
Option A
BookStack
BookStackApp/BookStack93/100
Simple, self-hosted, and opinionated wiki platform organized by Books, Chapters, and Pages.
HealthyFull Audit Report →
Option B
Wiki.js
requarks/wiki67/100
Node.js documentation engine with Git synchronization and modular storage backends.
CautionFull Audit Report →
Technical & Metric Comparison
Verifiable data scraped directly from GitHub API and OpenSSF scorecards.
| Metric | BookStack | Wiki.js | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composite Safety Score | 93/100 | 67/100 | BookStack |
| Status Verdict | Healthy | Caution | — |
| License SPDX | MIT | AGPL-3.0-only | — |
| GitHub Stars | 16,500 | 25,400 | Wiki.js (+8,900) |
| Primary Language | PHP / Laravel | JavaScript / Vue | — |
| Self-Host Difficulty | Easy | Medium | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 8.6/10 | 6.5/10 | BookStack |
| Last Push | 2d ago | 62d ago | BookStack |
Which Should You Pick? (Algorithmic Verdict)
BookStack holds a decisive advantage with a Safety Score of 93/100 compared to Wiki.js's 67/100. This divergence stems from superior maintenance responsiveness, fewer active supply-chain alerts, and stronger automated security audits. For production deployments, BookStack is the clear recommendation.
Pick BookStack if:
- You prefer a PHP / Laravel-based stack.
- You require MIT licensing terms.
- Its easy deployment fits your ops requirements.
Pick Wiki.js if:
- You prefer a JavaScript / Vue-based runtime.
- Your team works comfortably with AGPL-3.0-only.
- You value its specific community ecosystem and client support.
ADVERTISEMENTReserved Zero-CLS Placement