Head-to-Head Comparison
Authentik vs Passbolt
A side-by-side technical evaluation across security posture, maintenance cadence, community vitality, and commercial licensing within the Passwords & Authentication category.
Option A
Authentik
goauthentik/authentik90/100
Modern identity provider focused on flexibility, integration, and security protocols.
HealthyFull Audit Report →
Option B
Passbolt
passbolt/passbolt_api88/100
Open-source password manager designed specifically for agile team collaboration.
HealthyFull Audit Report →
Technical & Metric Comparison
Verifiable data scraped directly from GitHub API and OpenSSF scorecards.
| Metric | Authentik | Passbolt | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composite Safety Score | 90/100 | 88/100 | Authentik |
| Status Verdict | Healthy | Healthy | — |
| License SPDX | GPL-3.0-only | AGPL-3.0-only | — |
| GitHub Stars | 18,500 | 4,800 | Authentik (+13,700) |
| Primary Language | Python / Go | PHP | — |
| Self-Host Difficulty | Medium | Medium | — |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | 8.4/10 | 8.2/10 | Authentik |
| Last Push | 1d ago | 3d ago | Authentik |
Which Should You Pick? (Algorithmic Verdict)
Both tools demonstrate competitive quality, with Authentik holding a slight operational edge (90/100 vs 88/100). Choose Authentik if you prioritize stricter automated testing and recent release hygiene; choose Passbolt if its specific feature set (PHP) better matches your internal infrastructure.
Pick Authentik if:
- You prefer a Python / Go-based stack.
- You require GPL-3.0-only licensing terms.
- Its medium deployment fits your ops requirements.
Pick Passbolt if:
- You prefer a PHP-based runtime.
- Your team works comfortably with AGPL-3.0-only.
- You value its specific community ecosystem and client support.
ADVERTISEMENTReserved Zero-CLS Placement